↓ Skip to main content

Development of a colorimetric assay for heparanase activity suitable for kinetic analysis and inhibitor screening

Overview of attention for article published in Analytical Biochemistry, September 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
24 patents
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
82 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Development of a colorimetric assay for heparanase activity suitable for kinetic analysis and inhibitor screening
Published in
Analytical Biochemistry, September 2009
DOI 10.1016/j.ab.2009.09.007
Pubmed ID
Authors

Edward Hammond, Cai Ping Li, Vito Ferro

Abstract

The role that heparanase plays during metastasis and angiogenesis in tumors makes it an attractive target for cancer therapeutics. Despite this enzyme's significance, most of the assays developed to measure its activity are complex. Moreover, they usually rely on labeling variable preparations of the natural substrate heparan sulfate, making comparisons across studies precarious. To overcome these problems, we have developed a convenient assay based on the cleavage of the synthetic heparin oligosaccharide fondaparinux. The assay measures the appearance of the disaccharide product of heparanase-catalyzed fondaparinux cleavage colorimetrically using the tetrazolium salt WST-1. Because this assay has a homogeneous substrate with a single point of cleavage, the kinetics of the enzyme can be reliably characterized, giving a K(m) of 46 microM and a k(cat) of 3.5 s(-1) with fondaparinux as substrate. The inhibition of heparanase by the published inhibitor, PI-88, was also studied, and a K(i) of 7.9 nM was determined. The simplicity and robustness of this method, should, not only greatly assist routine assay of heparanase activity but also could be adapted for high-throughput screening of compound libraries, with the data generated being directly comparable across studies.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 2 4%
Malaysia 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 53 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 21%
Student > Master 9 16%
Student > Bachelor 6 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 6 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 26%
Chemistry 15 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 25%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 7 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2024.
All research outputs
#2,863,902
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Analytical Biochemistry
#142
of 8,534 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,508
of 103,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Analytical Biochemistry
#2
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,534 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,842 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.