| Title |
Die lunare und tägliche Schlüpfperiodik der Mücke Clunio
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Comparative Physiology A, March 1966
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00343045 |
| Authors |
Dietrich Neumann |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 11 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 33% |
| Researcher | 2 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 17% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 3 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 42% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 17% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 8% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 3 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2016.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Comparative Physiology A
#514
of 1,550 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#414
of 1,983 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Comparative Physiology A
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,550 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 1,983 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them