| Title |
18 F-FDG PET/CT for initial staging in breast cancer patients – Is there a relevant impact on treatment planning compared to conventional staging modalities?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Radiology, February 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00330-015-3630-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
J. Krammer, A. Schnitzer, C. G. Kaiser, K. A. Buesing, E. Sperk, J. Brade, S. Wasgindt, M. Suetterlin, S. O. Schoenberg, E. J. Sutton, K. Wasser |
| Abstract |
To evaluate the impact of whole-body (18) F-FDG PET/CT on initial staging of breast cancer in comparison to conventional staging modalities. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 54 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 19% |
| Researcher | 9 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 9% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 13% |
| Unknown | 14 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 41% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 9% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 2% |
| Psychology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Unknown | 18 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2015.
All research outputs
#14,216,861
of 22,792,160 outputs
Outputs from European Radiology
#2,138
of 4,114 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#205,208
of 385,323 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Radiology
#30
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,792,160 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,114 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 385,323 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.