You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evaluation of phenotypic screening tests for carbapenemase production in Pseudomonas aeruginosa from patients with cystic fibrosis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Microbiological Methods, February 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.mimet.2015.02.006 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anna S. Tai, Hanna E. Sidjabat, Timothy J. Kidd, David M. Whiley, David L. Paterson, Scott C. Bell |
| Abstract |
Carbapenemase phenotypic tests (inhibitor-based, modified Hodge and Carba NP) for Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) were evaluated with PCR as a reference assay. Except for Carba NP, all methods demonstrated high false positives. Carba NP test presents a promising screening method for CF P. aeruginosa isolates. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nigeria | 1 | 5% |
| Brazil | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 19 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 19% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 10% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 19% |
| Unknown | 4 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 24% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 19% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 14% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 10% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 5 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2015.
All research outputs
#14,914,476
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Microbiological Methods
#1,463
of 2,350 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#186,201
of 366,748 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Microbiological Methods
#16
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,350 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,748 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.