↓ Skip to main content

Cloning and characterization of the cDNA for lycopene β-cyclase from tomato reveals decrease in its expression during fruit ripening

Overview of attention for article published in Plant Molecular Biology, February 1996
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
251 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
93 Mendeley
Title
Cloning and characterization of the cDNA for lycopene β-cyclase from tomato reveals decrease in its expression during fruit ripening
Published in
Plant Molecular Biology, February 1996
DOI 10.1007/bf00019013
Pubmed ID
Authors

Iris Pecker, Rachel Gabbay, Francis X. Cunningham, Joseph Hirschberg

Abstract

The cDNA which encodes lycopene cyclase, CrtL, was cloned from tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum cv. VF36) and tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum cv. Samsun NN) and functionally expressed in Escherichia coli. This enzyme converts lycopene to beta-carotene by catalyzing the formation of two beta-rings at each end of the linear carotene. The enzyme interacts with half of the carotenoid molecule and requires a double bond at the C-7,8 (or C-7,8') position. Inhibition in E. coli indicated that lycopene cyclase is the target site for the inhibitor MPTA, 2-(4-methylphenoxy)tri-ethylamine hydrochloride. The primary structure of lycopene cyclase in higher plants is significantly conserved with the enzyme from cyanobacteria but different from that of the non-photosynthetic bacteria Erwinia. mRNA of CrtL and Pds, which encodes phytoene desaturase, was measured in leaves, flowers and ripening fruits of tomato. In contrast to genes which encode enzymes of early steps in the carotenoid biosynthesis pathway, whose transcription increases during the 'breaker' stage of fruit ripening, the level of CrtL mRNA decreases at this stage. Hence, the accumulation of lycopene in tomato fruits is apparently due to a down-regulation of the lycopene cyclase gene that occurs at the breaker stage of fruit development. This conclusion supports the hypothesis that transcriptional regulation of gene expression is a predominant mechanism of regulating carotenogenesis.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 91 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 22%
Researcher 16 17%
Student > Master 13 14%
Professor 9 10%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Other 18 19%
Unknown 9 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 53 57%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 22 24%
Computer Science 3 3%
Chemical Engineering 2 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 1%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 10 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2013.
All research outputs
#7,455,523
of 22,792,160 outputs
Outputs from Plant Molecular Biology
#976
of 2,846 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,926
of 79,262 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Molecular Biology
#25
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,792,160 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,846 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 79,262 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.