↓ Skip to main content

Recommendations on how to ensure the safety and effectiveness of biosimilars in Latin America: a point of view

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Rheumatology, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
25 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
Title
Recommendations on how to ensure the safety and effectiveness of biosimilars in Latin America: a point of view
Published in
Clinical Rheumatology, February 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10067-015-2887-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carlos Pineda, Carlo V. Caballero-Uribe, Marcia Gonclaves de Oliveira, Pedro Saul Lipszyc, Jose Julian Lopez, Marcelo Mario Mataos Moreira, Valderilio Feijo Azevedo

Abstract

The use of biotechnology-derived medicines has significantly increased in recent decades. Although biosimilars undergo rigorous characterization as well as clinical studies to document their safety and effectiveness, they are highly complex molecules and small changes in the purification and production process of a biosimilar can have major implications in its safety and effectiveness profile. In Latin America, regulatory authorities have begun to establish well-described and standardized pathways that permit a biosimilar to gain commercial licensure. In order to be certain that a biosimilar reaches its potential in ordinary clinical use, an intensive post-licensing monitoring system must be established since it is the only means to ascertain the true similarity between the original biologic and its biosimilar. Pharmacovigilance allows national authorities to determine a drug's performance in the marketplace. An effective tracking and pharmacovigilance system for biological medicines has many steps and processes. To aid policy makers in Latin American in addressing the many issues surrounding the establishment of an effective pharmacovigilance system, the Americas Health Foundation convened a group of experts to discuss the topic and develop recommendations for implementation. The group discussed current challenges and gaps in pharmacovigilance in Latin America, paying close attention to the major issues associated with traceability and pharmacovigilance of biosimilars following their approval. The recommendations developed should enable countries to accurately document the safety and performance of a biosimilar as experienced by patients under real-life conditions and have a significant impact on the successful implementation of pharmacovigilance of biosimilars throughout the region.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 2%
Unknown 65 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 17%
Student > Master 11 17%
Student > Bachelor 9 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 6%
Student > Postgraduate 4 6%
Other 14 21%
Unknown 13 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 27%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 15 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 18 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2016.
All research outputs
#2,030,014
of 23,751,351 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Rheumatology
#233
of 3,113 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,628
of 361,529 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Rheumatology
#1
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,751,351 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,113 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,529 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.