↓ Skip to main content

Proteomic studies of an Antarctic cold-adapted bacterium, Shewanella livingstonensis Ac10, for global identification of cold-inducible proteins

Overview of attention for article published in Extremophiles, July 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
65 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
Title
Proteomic studies of an Antarctic cold-adapted bacterium, Shewanella livingstonensis Ac10, for global identification of cold-inducible proteins
Published in
Extremophiles, July 2007
DOI 10.1007/s00792-007-0098-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jun Kawamoto, Tatsuo Kurihara, Masanari Kitagawa, Ikunoshin Kato, Nobuyoshi Esaki

Abstract

Proteomic analysis of a cold-adapted bacterium, Shewanella livingstonensis Ac10, isolated from Antarctic seawater was carried out to elucidate its cold-adaptation mechanism. The cells were grown at 4 degrees C and 18 degrees C, and soluble and membrane proteins were analyzed by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis. At 4 degrees C, the relative abundance of 47 soluble proteins and five membrane proteins increased more than twofold, and these proteins were analyzed by peptide mass fingerprinting. Twenty-six soluble proteins and two membrane proteins were identified. These included proteins involved in RNA synthesis and folding (RpoA, GreA, and CspA), protein synthesis and folding (TufB, Efp, LysU, and Tig), membrane transport (OmpA and OmpC), and motility (FlgE and FlgL). Cold-inducible RpoA, GreA, and CspA may be required for efficient and accurate transcription and proper folding of RNA at low temperatures, where base pairing of nucleic acids is stable and undesired secondary structures of RNA tend to form. Tig is supposed to have peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase activity and facilitate proper folding of proteins at low temperatures. The cold induction of OmpA and OmpC is likely to counteract the low diffusion rate of solutes at low temperatures and enables the efficient uptake of nutrients. These results provided many clues to understand microbial cold-adaptation mechanisms.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Argentina 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 57 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 22%
Student > Bachelor 10 17%
Student > Master 9 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 12%
Professor 4 7%
Other 9 15%
Unknown 8 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 43%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 20%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 5%
Environmental Science 2 3%
Unspecified 1 2%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 14 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2019.
All research outputs
#7,455,523
of 22,792,160 outputs
Outputs from Extremophiles
#228
of 799 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,519
of 68,233 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Extremophiles
#3
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,792,160 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 799 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 68,233 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.