↓ Skip to main content

General relativistic chaos and nonlinear dynamics

Overview of attention for article published in General Relativity and Gravitation, June 1982
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
General relativistic chaos and nonlinear dynamics
Published in
General Relativity and Gravitation, June 1982
DOI 10.1007/bf00756214
Authors

John D. Barrow

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 2 40%
Researcher 2 40%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 2 40%
Environmental Science 1 20%
Psychology 1 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2017.
All research outputs
#7,917,073
of 23,857,313 outputs
Outputs from General Relativity and Gravitation
#285
of 1,448 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,055
of 7,877 outputs
Outputs of similar age from General Relativity and Gravitation
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,857,313 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,448 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 7,877 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them