↓ Skip to main content

Porcine epidemic diarrhoea virus: a comprehensive review of molecular epidemiology, diagnosis, and vaccines

Overview of attention for article published in Virus Genes, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#9 of 1,076)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
patent
24 patents
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
532 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
296 Mendeley
Title
Porcine epidemic diarrhoea virus: a comprehensive review of molecular epidemiology, diagnosis, and vaccines
Published in
Virus Genes, January 2012
DOI 10.1007/s11262-012-0713-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daesub Song, Bongkyun Park

Abstract

The porcine epidemic diarrhoea virus (PEDV), a member of the Coronaviridae family, causes acute diarrhoea and dehydration in pigs. Although it was first identified in Europe, it has become increasingly problematic in many Asian countries, including Korea, China, Japan, the Philippines, and Thailand. The economic impacts of the PEDV are substantial, given that it results in significant morbidity and mortality in neonatal piglets and is associated with increased costs related to vaccination and disinfection. Recently, progress has been made in understanding the molecular epidemiology of PEDV, thereby leading to the development of new vaccines. In the current review, we first describe the molecular and genetic characteristics of the PEDV. Then we discuss its molecular epidemiology and diagnosis, what vaccines are available, and how PEDV can be treated.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 296 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 2%
Peru 2 <1%
Mexico 2 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 282 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 70 24%
Researcher 42 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 14%
Student > Bachelor 25 8%
Other 16 5%
Other 44 15%
Unknown 58 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 86 29%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 54 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 27 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 20 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 9 3%
Other 30 10%
Unknown 70 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2023.
All research outputs
#1,999,840
of 25,760,414 outputs
Outputs from Virus Genes
#9
of 1,076 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,999
of 253,697 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Virus Genes
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,760,414 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,076 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 253,697 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them