↓ Skip to main content

The Quality of Well-Being scale in asymptomatic HIV-infected patients

Overview of attention for article published in Quality of Life Research, November 1997
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
Title
The Quality of Well-Being scale in asymptomatic HIV-infected patients
Published in
Quality of Life Research, November 1997
DOI 10.1023/a:1018456031659
Pubmed ID
Authors

R. M. Kaplan, T. L. Patterson, D. N. Kerner, J. Hampton Atkinson, R. K. Heaton, I. Grant

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 13%
Unknown 13 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 33%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 20%
Student > Bachelor 2 13%
Lecturer 1 7%
Student > Master 1 7%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 1 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 4 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 27%
Social Sciences 3 20%
Mathematics 1 7%
Unknown 3 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2013.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Quality of Life Research
#959
of 3,062 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,403
of 29,633 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Quality of Life Research
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,062 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 29,633 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them