↓ Skip to main content

On Chytridium braun, Diplochytridium N. G., and Canteria N. G. (Chytridiales)

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Microbiology, June 1971
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
On Chytridium braun, Diplochytridium N. G., and Canteria N. G. (Chytridiales)
Published in
Archives of Microbiology, June 1971
DOI 10.1007/bf00411786
Authors

John S. Karling

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 25%
Unknown 3 75%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 25%
Researcher 1 25%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 50%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2016.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Microbiology
#641
of 3,119 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#647
of 3,066 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Microbiology
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,119 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 3,066 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them