| Title |
Division of labor and recurrent evolution of polymorphisms in a group of colonial animals
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Evolutionary Ecology, August 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10682-011-9513-7 |
| Authors |
Scott Lidgard, Michelle C. Carter, Matthew H. Dick, Dennis P. Gordon, Andrew N. Ostrovsky |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 54 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 19 | 33% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 5% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 9 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 30 | 52% |
| Environmental Science | 7 | 12% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 5 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
| Philosophy | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 13 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2013.
All research outputs
#7,455,523
of 22,792,160 outputs
Outputs from Evolutionary Ecology
#291
of 704 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,961
of 123,547 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Evolutionary Ecology
#4
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,792,160 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 704 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 123,547 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.