↓ Skip to main content

Ghana's Vanishing Past: Development, Antiquities, and the Destruction of the Archaeological Record

Overview of attention for article published in African Archaeological Review, June 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
Title
Ghana's Vanishing Past: Development, Antiquities, and the Destruction of the Archaeological Record
Published in
African Archaeological Review, June 2004
DOI 10.1023/b:aarr.0000030786.24067.19
Authors

Benjamin W. Kankpeyeng, Christopher R. DeCorse

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
South Africa 1 2%
Unknown 57 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 15%
Student > Bachelor 8 14%
Student > Master 6 10%
Other 5 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Other 16 27%
Unknown 10 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 17 29%
Social Sciences 13 22%
Design 5 8%
Unspecified 2 3%
Environmental Science 2 3%
Other 9 15%
Unknown 11 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2014.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from African Archaeological Review
#158
of 394 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,855
of 62,303 outputs
Outputs of similar age from African Archaeological Review
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 394 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 62,303 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.