↓ Skip to main content

Clinical benefit of long-term lipoprotein apheresis in patients with severe hypercholesterolemia or Lp(a)-hyperlipoproteinemia with progressive cardiovascular disease

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Research in Cardiology Supplements, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
Clinical benefit of long-term lipoprotein apheresis in patients with severe hypercholesterolemia or Lp(a)-hyperlipoproteinemia with progressive cardiovascular disease
Published in
Clinical Research in Cardiology Supplements, February 2015
DOI 10.1007/s11789-015-0071-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Franz Heigl, Reinhard Hettich, Norbert Lotz, Harduin Reeg, Tobias Pflederer, Dirk Osterkorn, Klaus Osterkorn, Reinhard Klingel

Abstract

Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) are established causal risk factors for cardiovascular disease (CVD). Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of lipoprotein apheresis (LA) were investigated in 118 patients with CVD covering a period with 36,745 LA treatments in a retrospective, monocentric study. Indications for LA were severe hypercholesterolemia (n = 83) or isolated Lp(a) hyperlipoproteinemia (Lp(a)-HLP) (n = 35). In patients with hypercholesterolemia, initial pre-LA LDL-C was 176.4 ± 67.0 mg/dL. In patients with isolated Lp(a)-HLP, initial pre-LA Lp(a) was 127.2 ± 67.3 mg/dL. Mean reduction rates of LA were 67 % for both LDL-C and Lp(a). During chronic LA, the average annual rate of major adverse cardiac events of all patients declined by 79.7 % (p < 0.0001). Subgroup analysis showed decline by 73.7 % (p < 0.0001) in patients with severe hypercholesterolemia, and by 90.4 % (p < 0.0001) in patients with isolated Lp(a)-HLP. Adverse events occurred in 1.1 % of treatments. LA treatment of patients with a high risk for CVD due to hypercholesterolemia and/or Lp(a)-HLP demonstrated clinical benefit and was safe and well tolerated.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1 100%
Other 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 200%