↓ Skip to main content

A stress protein is induced in the deep-sea barophilic hyperthermophile Thermococcus barophilus when grown under atmospheric pressure

Overview of attention for article published in Extremophiles, November 1999
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
A stress protein is induced in the deep-sea barophilic hyperthermophile Thermococcus barophilus when grown under atmospheric pressure
Published in
Extremophiles, November 1999
DOI 10.1007/s007920050128
Pubmed ID
Authors

V. T. Marteinsson, A. -L. Reysenbach, J. -L. Birrien, D. Prieur

Abstract

The whole-cell protein inventory of the deep-sea barophilic hyperthermophile Thermococcus barophilus was examined by one-dimensional SDS gradient gel electrophoresis when grown under different pressure conditions at 85 degrees C (Topt). One protein (P60) with a molecular mass of approximately 60 kDa was prominent at low pressures (0.3 MPa hydrostatic pressure and 0.1 MPa atmospheric pressure) but not at deep-sea pressures (10, 30, and 40 MPa). About 17 amino acids were sequenced from the N-terminal end of the protein. Sequence homology analysis in the GenBank database showed that P60 most closely resembled heat-shock proteins in some sulfur-metabolizing Archaea. A high degree of amino acid identity (81%-93%) to thermosome subunits in Thermococcales strains was found. Another protein (P35) with molecular mass of approximately 35.5 kDa was induced at 40 MPa hydrostatic pressure but not under low-pressure conditions. No amino acid sequence homology was found for this protein when the 40 amino acids from the N-terminal end were compared with homologous regions of proteins from databases. A PTk diagram was generated for T. barophilus. The results suggest that Phabitat is about 35 MPa, which corresponds to the in situ pressure where the strain was obtained.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Portugal 1 3%
Canada 1 3%
Unknown 29 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 31%
Professor 5 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 16%
Student > Postgraduate 2 6%
Student > Master 2 6%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 7 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 47%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 6%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Physics and Astronomy 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 7 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2016.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Extremophiles
#235
of 816 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,675
of 36,316 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Extremophiles
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 816 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 36,316 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.