↓ Skip to main content

Protein Arginine Methylation in Mammals: Who, What, and Why

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Cell, January 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
14 patents
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
1462 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1014 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Protein Arginine Methylation in Mammals: Who, What, and Why
Published in
Molecular Cell, January 2009
DOI 10.1016/j.molcel.2008.12.013
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mark T. Bedford, Steven G. Clarke

Abstract

The covalent marking of proteins by methyl group addition to arginine residues can promote their recognition by binding partners or can modulate their biological activity. A small family of gene products that catalyze such methylation reactions in eukaryotes (PRMTs) works in conjunction with a changing cast of associated subunits to recognize distinct cellular substrates. These reactions display many of the attributes of reversible covalent modifications such as protein phosphorylation or protein lysine methylation; however, it is unclear to what extent protein arginine demethylation occurs. Physiological roles for protein arginine methylation have been established in signal transduction, mRNA splicing, transcriptional control, DNA repair, and protein translocation.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,014 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 <1%
United Kingdom 6 <1%
Brazil 3 <1%
France 3 <1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
Denmark 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
Argentina 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Other 9 <1%
Unknown 976 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 263 26%
Researcher 143 14%
Student > Master 138 14%
Student > Bachelor 98 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 46 5%
Other 144 14%
Unknown 182 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 346 34%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 270 27%
Chemistry 71 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 52 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 23 2%
Other 61 6%
Unknown 191 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2023.
All research outputs
#2,946,280
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Cell
#2,800
of 7,722 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,672
of 189,349 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Cell
#8
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,722 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 189,349 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.