| Title |
A comparison of five heuristics for the multiple depot vehicle scheduling problem
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Scheduling, July 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10951-008-0072-x |
| Authors |
Ann-Sophie Pepin, Guy Desaulniers, Alain Hertz, Dennis Huisman |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 104 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 28% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 20% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 18 | 17% |
| Unknown | 18 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 37 | 34% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 15 | 14% |
| Computer Science | 10 | 9% |
| Mathematics | 7 | 6% |
| Decision Sciences | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 9% |
| Unknown | 24 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2019.
All research outputs
#7,455,523
of 22,792,160 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Scheduling
#22
of 128 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,582
of 81,669 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Scheduling
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,792,160 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 128 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 81,669 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them