↓ Skip to main content

Analysis and modeling of a tropical-like cyclonein the Mediterranean Sea

Overview of attention for article published in Meteorology and Atmospheric Physics, April 2001
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
Title
Analysis and modeling of a tropical-like cyclonein the Mediterranean Sea
Published in
Meteorology and Atmospheric Physics, April 2001
DOI 10.1007/s007030170029
Authors

R. J. Reed, Y.-H. Kuo, M. D. Albright, K. Gao, Y.-R. Guo, W. Huang

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 12%
Spain 1 6%
Norway 1 6%
Unknown 13 76%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 53%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 18%
Student > Master 2 12%
Librarian 1 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 10 59%
Environmental Science 3 18%
Physics and Astronomy 2 12%
Unknown 2 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2023.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Meteorology and Atmospheric Physics
#111
of 406 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,511
of 43,239 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Meteorology and Atmospheric Physics
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 406 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 43,239 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them