↓ Skip to main content

Studies on cardio-suppressant, vasodilator and tracheal relaxant effects ofSarcococca saligna

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Pharmacal Research, November 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
Title
Studies on cardio-suppressant, vasodilator and tracheal relaxant effects ofSarcococca saligna
Published in
Archives of Pharmacal Research, November 2006
DOI 10.1007/bf02969283
Pubmed ID
Authors

Muhammad Nabeel Ghayur, Anwarul Hassan Gilani

Abstract

Sarcococca saligna is a shrub that is traditionally used for its medicinal properties in Pakistan. In this study we report the cardio-suppressant, vasodilator and tracheal relaxant activities of the aqueous-methanolic extract (Ss.Cr) of the plant. Ss.Cr, that tested positive for the presence of saponins, flavonoids, tannins, phenols, and alkaloids, exhibited a dose-dependent (0.3-5 mg/mL) negative inotropic and chronotropic effect on the isolated guinea-pig atrium which was resistant to atropine (1 microM) and aminophylline (10 microM) pretreatment. In rabbit thoracic aorta, Ss.Cr dose-dependently (0.1-3 mg/mL) relaxed the high K+ (80 mM) and phenylephrine (PE, 1 microM)-induced contractions, indicating a possible Ca++ channel blocking (CCB) effect. When tested against PE (1 microM) control peaks in normal Ca++ and Ca++-free Kreb's solution, Ss.Cr exhibited dose-dependent (0.1-3 mg/mL) inhibition, being more potent in relaxing the PE responses in Ca++-free Kreb's solution, thus indicating specific blockade of Ca++ release from the intracellular stores. Ss.Cr also relaxed the agonist-induced contractions in: a) rat aorta irrespective of the presence of endothelium or nitric oxide synthase inhibitor L-NAME and b) rabbit and guinea-pig tracheal strips. The data shows that Ss.Cr possesses possible Ca++ channel blocking activity which might be responsible for its observed cardio-suppressant, vasodilator and tracheal relaxant effects though more tests are required to confirm this Ca++ channel blocking effect.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
China 1 10%
Unknown 9 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 20%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 10%
Student > Bachelor 1 10%
Researcher 1 10%
Other 1 10%
Unknown 2 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 10%
Unknown 3 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2014.
All research outputs
#8,511,458
of 25,381,864 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Pharmacal Research
#407
of 1,369 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,602
of 85,263 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Pharmacal Research
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,381,864 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,369 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 85,263 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.