↓ Skip to main content

Morphological and physiological correlates of the colony foundation mode and reproductive role differentiation in Belonogaster juncea juncea (Vespidae, Polistinae)

Overview of attention for article published in Insectes Sociaux, March 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
Title
Morphological and physiological correlates of the colony foundation mode and reproductive role differentiation in Belonogaster juncea juncea (Vespidae, Polistinae)
Published in
Insectes Sociaux, March 2007
DOI 10.1007/s00040-007-0925-x
Authors

M. Tindo, M. Kenne, J. Orivel, A. Dejean

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 33%
Researcher 2 22%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 11%
Student > Master 1 11%
Unknown 2 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 78%
Unknown 2 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2014.
All research outputs
#7,455,523
of 22,792,160 outputs
Outputs from Insectes Sociaux
#323
of 966 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,008
of 75,696 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Insectes Sociaux
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,792,160 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 966 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 75,696 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.