| Title |
The ‘Economy of Memory’: Publications, Citations, and the Paradox of Effective Research Governance
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Minerva, June 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11024-013-9232-z |
| Authors |
Peter Woelert |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Uruguay | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Sweden | 1 | 2% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 42 | 84% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 8 | 16% |
| Researcher | 7 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 12% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 14 | 28% |
| Unknown | 7 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 16 | 32% |
| Arts and Humanities | 6 | 12% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 10% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 8% |
| Psychology | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 16% |
| Unknown | 9 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2022.
All research outputs
#2,937,271
of 22,788,370 outputs
Outputs from Minerva
#78
of 392 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,337
of 196,988 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Minerva
#5
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,788,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 392 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,988 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.