↓ Skip to main content

Seasonal range selection in bighorn sheep: conflicts between forage quality, forage quantity, and predator avoidance

Overview of attention for article published in Oecologia, May 1988
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
256 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
234 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Seasonal range selection in bighorn sheep: conflicts between forage quality, forage quantity, and predator avoidance
Published in
Oecologia, May 1988
DOI 10.1007/bf00776423
Pubmed ID
Authors

M. Festa-Bianchet

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 234 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Argentina 3 1%
France 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Romania 1 <1%
Thailand 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 226 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 56 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 44 19%
Researcher 43 18%
Student > Bachelor 25 11%
Other 9 4%
Other 27 12%
Unknown 30 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 131 56%
Environmental Science 53 23%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 1%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 <1%
Other 7 3%
Unknown 34 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2022.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#1,960
of 4,909 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,834
of 13,026 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#4
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,909 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 13,026 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.