| Title |
Improving clinical handover between intensive care unit and general ward professionals at intensive care unit discharge
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, February 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00134-015-3666-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nelleke van Sluisveld, Gijs Hesselink, Johannes Gerardus van der Hoeven, Gert Westert, Hub Wollersheim, Marieke Zegers |
| Abstract |
To systematically review and evaluate the effectiveness of interventions in order to improve the safety and efficiency of patient handover between intensive care unit (ICU) and general ward healthcare professionals at ICU discharge. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 5 | 33% |
| United States | 3 | 20% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 13% |
| United Arab Emirates | 1 | 7% |
| Canada | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 3 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 60% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 33% |
| Scientists | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 241 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 238 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 34 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 29 | 12% |
| Other | 21 | 9% |
| Researcher | 21 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 7% |
| Other | 58 | 24% |
| Unknown | 60 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 71 | 29% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 59 | 24% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 7 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 26 | 11% |
| Unknown | 65 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2017.
All research outputs
#2,323,429
of 23,340,595 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#1,668
of 5,059 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,590
of 360,443 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#11
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,340,595 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,059 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,443 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.