↓ Skip to main content

Mutation analysis of CBL-C and SPRED3 on 19q in human glioblastoma

Overview of attention for article published in neurogenetics, November 2003
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
Mutation analysis of CBL-C and SPRED3 on 19q in human glioblastoma
Published in
neurogenetics, November 2003
DOI 10.1007/s10048-003-0164-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Masahiro Mizoguchi, Catherine L. Nutt, David N. Louis

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 14%
Brazil 1 14%
Unknown 5 71%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 57%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 29%
Professor 1 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 43%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2018.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from neurogenetics
#130
of 389 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,033
of 59,932 outputs
Outputs of similar age from neurogenetics
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 389 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 59,932 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.