↓ Skip to main content

The New Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory: Implications for Personality Measurement

Overview of attention for article published in Personality and Social Psychology Review, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
319 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
260 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The New Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory: Implications for Personality Measurement
Published in
Personality and Social Psychology Review, December 2016
DOI 10.1207/s15327957pspr1004_3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Luke D. Smillie, Alan D. Pickering, Chris J. Jackson

Abstract

In this article, we review recent modifications to Jeffrey Gray's (1973, 1991) reinforcement sensitivity theory (RST), and attempt to draw implications for psychometric measurement of personality traits. First, we consider Gray and McNaughton's (2000) functional revisions to the biobehavioral systems of RST. Second, we evaluate recent clarifications relating to interdependent effects that these systems may have on behavior, in addition to or in place of separable effects (e.g., Corr, 2001; Pickering, 1997). Finally, we consider ambiguities regarding the exact trait dimension to which Gray's "reward system" corresponds. From this review, we suggest that future work is needed to distinguish psychometric measures of (a) fear from anxiety and (b) reward-reactivity from trait impulsivity. We also suggest, on the basis of interdependent system views of RST and associated exploration using formal models, that traits that are based upon RST are likely to have substantial intercorrelations. Finally, we advise that more substantive work is required to define relevant constructs and behaviors in RST before we can be confident in our psychometric measures of them.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 260 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
United Kingdom 3 1%
Australia 2 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Slovenia 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Estonia 1 <1%
Other 3 1%
Unknown 242 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 69 27%
Researcher 32 12%
Student > Bachelor 31 12%
Student > Master 29 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 6%
Other 37 14%
Unknown 47 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 146 56%
Social Sciences 7 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 2%
Other 26 10%
Unknown 63 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2022.
All research outputs
#7,455,523
of 22,792,160 outputs
Outputs from Personality and Social Psychology Review
#305
of 398 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#140,226
of 420,194 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Personality and Social Psychology Review
#96
of 136 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,792,160 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 398 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.9. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,194 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 136 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.