↓ Skip to main content

Characterization of active miniature inverted-repeat transposable elements in the peanut genome

Overview of attention for article published in Theoretical and Applied Genetics, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
Title
Characterization of active miniature inverted-repeat transposable elements in the peanut genome
Published in
Theoretical and Applied Genetics, February 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00122-012-1798-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kenta Shirasawa, Hideki Hirakawa, Satoshi Tabata, Makoto Hasegawa, Hiroyuki Kiyoshima, Sigeru Suzuki, Sigemi Sasamoto, Akiko Watanabe, Tsunakazu Fujishiro, Sachiko Isobe

Abstract

Miniature inverted-repeat transposable elements (MITEs), some of which are known as active nonautonomous DNA transposons, are found in the genomes of plants and animals. In peanut (Arachis hypogaea), Ah-MITE1 has been identified in a gene for fatty-acid desaturase, and possessed excision activity. However, the AhMITE1 distribution and frequency of excision have not been determined for the peanut genome. In order to characterize AhMITE1s, their genomic diversity and transposition ability was investigated. Southern blot analysis indicated high AhMITE1 copy number in the genomes of A. hypogaea, A. magna and A. monticola, but not in A. duranensis. A total of 504 AhMITE1s were identified from the MITE-enriched genomic libraries of A. hypogaea. The representative AhMITE1s exhibited a mean length of 205.5 bp and a GC content of 30.1%, with AT-rich, 9 bp target site duplications and 25 bp terminal inverted repeats. PCR analyses were performed using primer pairs designed against both flanking sequences of each AhMITE1. These analyses detected polymorphisms at 169 out of 411 insertional loci in the four peanut lines. In subsequent analyses of 60 gamma-irradiated mutant lines, four Ah-MITE1 excisions showed footprint mutations at the 109 loci tested. This study characterizes AhMITE1s in peanut and discusses their use as DNA markers and mutagens for the genetics, genomics and breeding of peanut and its relatives.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 3 5%
Netherlands 1 2%
Unknown 53 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 32%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 9%
Student > Postgraduate 2 4%
Other 2 4%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 7 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 37 65%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 11%
Social Sciences 3 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 2%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 7 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2016.
All research outputs
#7,845,540
of 23,794,258 outputs
Outputs from Theoretical and Applied Genetics
#1,366
of 3,565 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,734
of 252,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Theoretical and Applied Genetics
#3
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,794,258 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,565 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 252,003 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.