↓ Skip to main content

Preferred rates of repetitive tapping and categorical time production

Overview of attention for article published in Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, July 1994
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
104 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
Title
Preferred rates of repetitive tapping and categorical time production
Published in
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, July 1994
DOI 10.3758/bf03205301
Pubmed ID
Authors

Charles E. Collyer, Hilary A. Broadbent, Russell M. Church

Abstract

In a constrained finger-tapping task, in which a subject attempts to match the rate of tapping responses to the rate of a pacer stimulus, interresponse interval (IRI) was a nonlinear function of interstimulus interval (ISI), in agreement with the results of Collyer, Broadbent, and Church (1992). In an unconstrained task, the subjects were not given an ISI to match, but were instructed to tap at their preferred rate, one that seemed not too fast or too slow for comfortable production. The distribution of preferred IRIs was bimodal rather than unimodal, with modes at 272 and 450 msec. Preferred IRIs also tended to become shorter over successive sessions. Time intervals that were preferred in the unconstrained task tended to be intervals that were overproduced (IRI > ISI) when they were used as ISIs in the constrained task. A multiple-oscillator model of timing developed by Church and Broadbent (1990) was used to simulate the two tasks. The nonlinearity in constrained tapping, termed the oscillator signature, and the bimodal distribution in unconstrained tapping were both exhibited by the model. The nature of the experimental results and the success of the simulation in capturing them both provide further support for a multiple-oscillator view of timing.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Sweden 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
Finland 1 1%
Unknown 69 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 25%
Researcher 13 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 9%
Student > Master 6 8%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Other 14 19%
Unknown 11 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 21 28%
Neuroscience 13 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 9%
Computer Science 3 4%
Sports and Recreations 3 4%
Other 11 15%
Unknown 17 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2021.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics
#580
of 2,380 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,163
of 20,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,380 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 20,187 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.