↓ Skip to main content

Genome Sequence of the Plant-Pathogenic Bacterium Dickeya dadantii 3937

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Bacteriology, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
94 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
96 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Genome Sequence of the Plant-Pathogenic Bacterium Dickeya dadantii 3937
Published in
Journal of Bacteriology, January 2011
DOI 10.1128/jb.01513-10
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jeremy D. Glasner, Ching-Hong Yang, Sylvie Reverchon, Nicole Hugouvieux-Cotte-Pattat, Guy Condemine, Jean-Pierre Bohin, Frédérique Van Gijsegem, Shihui Yang, Thierry Franza, Dominique Expert, Guy Plunkett, Michael J. San Francisco, Amy O. Charkowski, Béatrice Py, Kenneth Bell, Lise Rauscher, Pablo Rodriguez-Palenzuela, Ariane Toussaint, Maria C. Holeva, Sheng Yang He, Vanessa Douet, Martine Boccara, Carlos Blanco, Ian Toth, Bradley D. Anderson, Bryan S. Biehl, Bob Mau, Sarah M. Flynn, Frédéric Barras, Magdalen Lindeberg, Paul R. J. Birch, Shinji Tsuyumu, Xiangyang Shi, Michael Hibbing, Yap Mee-Ngan, Mathilde Carpentier, Elie Dassa, Masahiro Umehara, Jihyun F. Kim, Michael Rusch, Pritin Soni, George F. Mayhew, Derrick E. Fouts, Steven R. Gill, Frederick R. Blattner, Noel T. Keen, Nicole T. Perna

Abstract

Dickeya dadantii is a plant-pathogenic enterobacterium responsible for the soft rot disease of many plants of economic importance. We present here the sequence of strain 3937, a strain widely used as a model system for research on the molecular biology and pathogenicity of this group of bacteria.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
South Africa 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 92 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 17%
Student > Master 11 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Student > Bachelor 5 5%
Other 16 17%
Unknown 19 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 44 46%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 19%
Immunology and Microbiology 8 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 2%
Engineering 2 2%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 19 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 July 2017.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Bacteriology
#6,153
of 16,901 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,066
of 190,837 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Bacteriology
#35
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,901 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,837 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.