↓ Skip to main content

A phase II study of bevacizumab and irinotecan plus alternate-day S-1 as a second-line therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: the AIRS study

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
Title
A phase II study of bevacizumab and irinotecan plus alternate-day S-1 as a second-line therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: the AIRS study
Published in
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology, April 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00280-018-3568-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chu Matsuda, Michitaka Honda, Chihiro Tanaka, Ken Kondo, Takao Takahashi, Chihiro Kosugi, Yukihiko Tokunaga, Hiroyoshi Takemoto, Ho Min Kim, Junichi Sakamoto, Koji Oba, Hideyuki Mishima

Abstract

The aim of this single-arm phase II clinical trial was to evaluate whether the alternate-day administration of S-1 plus irinotecan would reduce the incidence of severe diarrhea in comparison to consecutive-day S-1 administration (standard IRIS regimen) in second-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer after failure with first-line treatment of oxaliplatin and fluoropyrimidine were enrolled. Irinotecan (150 mg/m2) and bevacizumab (5 mg/kg) were given intravenously on day 1. Oral S-1 was administered on alternate days at a dose of 40-60 mg twice a day. Cycles were repeated every 2 weeks. The primary endpoint was the incidence of grade ≥ 3 diarrhea. Our hypothesis set 21% as a threshold incidence and 10% as an expected incidence from previous studies with one-sided alpha 0.05. The secondary endpoints included the relative dose intensity, progression-free survival, overall survival and other adverse events. A total of 51 patients were enrolled. The incidence of grade ≥ 3 diarrhea was 15.7% (8/51). Other common grade ≥ 3 adverse events were neutropenia, anemia, thrombocytopenia and fatigue were 13.7% (7/51), 5.9% (3/51), 2.0% (1/51) and 5.9% (3/51), respectively. The relative dose intensities of irinotecan, bevacizumab, and S-1 were 80.0, 86.8, and 77.7%, respectively. The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 8.4 months (5.8-9.8) and 17.1 months (11.8-22.3). The alternate-day S-1 administration does not have significant effectiveness to reduce diarrhea in patients who received second-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 17%
Lecturer 2 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 11%
Researcher 2 11%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 6 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 39%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 6%
Unknown 7 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2018.
All research outputs
#18,550,468
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology
#1,988
of 2,501 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#241,585
of 330,715 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology
#12
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,501 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,715 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.