↓ Skip to main content

Eliciting the experiences of the adolescent-parent dyad following critical care admission: a pilot study

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Pediatrics, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
Title
Eliciting the experiences of the adolescent-parent dyad following critical care admission: a pilot study
Published in
European Journal of Pediatrics, February 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00431-018-3117-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dora Wood, Sophie Geoghegan, Padmanabhan Ramnarayan, Peter J. Davis, John V. Pappachan, Sarah Goodwin, Jo Wray

Abstract

Critically ill adolescents are usually treated on intensive care units optimised for much older adults or younger children. The way they access and experience health services may be very different to most adolescent service users, and existing quality criteria may not apply to them. The objectives of this pilot study were, firstly, to determine whether adolescents and their families were able to articulate their experiences of their critical care admission and secondly, to identify the factors that are important to them during their intensive care unit (ICU) or high dependency unit (HDU) stay. Participants were 14-17 year olds who had previously had an emergency admission to an adult or paediatric ICU/HDU in one of four UK hospitals (two adult, two paediatric) and their parents. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with eight mother-adolescent dyads and one mother. Interviews were transcribed and analysed using framework analysis. The main reported determinant of high-quality care was the quality of interaction with staff. The significance of these interactions and their environment depended on adolescents' awareness of their surroundings, which was often limited in ICU and changed significantly over the course of their illness. Qualitative interview methodology would be difficult to scale up for this group. What is known • Critically ill adolescents are usually treated on intensive care units optimised for older adults or younger children. • The way they access and experience health services may be different to most adolescent patients; existing quality criteria may not apply. What is new • Reported determinants of high-quality care were age-appropriateness of the environment, respectfulness and friendliness of staff, communication and inclusion in healthcare decisions. • The significance of these depended on adolescents' awareness of their surroundings, which was often limited and changed over the course of their illness.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 52 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 6 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 10%
Researcher 5 10%
Student > Master 5 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 21 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 10 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 15%
Social Sciences 5 10%
Psychology 3 6%
Unspecified 2 4%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 23 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2023.
All research outputs
#6,277,257
of 24,717,821 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Pediatrics
#1,241
of 4,183 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,419
of 336,028 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Pediatrics
#29
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,717,821 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,183 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,028 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.