↓ Skip to main content

Schwann-Cell Autophagy, Functional Recovery, and Scar Reduction After Peripheral Nerve Repair

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Molecular Neuroscience, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
Title
Schwann-Cell Autophagy, Functional Recovery, and Scar Reduction After Peripheral Nerve Repair
Published in
Journal of Molecular Neuroscience, April 2018
DOI 10.1007/s12031-018-1056-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Po-Yen Ko, Cheng-Chang Yang, Yao-Lung Kuo, Fong-Chin Su, Tai-I Hsu, Yuan-Kun Tu, I-Ming Jou

Abstract

The functional outcome after peripheral nerve repair is often unpredictable for many reasons, e.g., the severity of neuronal death and scarring. Axonal degeneration significantly affects outcomes. Post-injury axonal degeneration in peripheral nerves is accompanied by myelin degradation initiated by Schwann cells (SCs), which activate autophagy, a ubiquitous cytoprotective process essential for degrading and recycling cellular constituents. Scar formation occurs concomitantly with nerve insult and axonal degeneration. The association between SC autophagy and the mechanisms of nerve scar formation is still unknown. A rat model of peripheral nerve lesions induced by sciatic nerve transection injuries was used to examine the function of autophagy in fibrosis reduction during the early phase of nerve repair. Rats were treated with rapamycin (autophagy inducer) or 3-methyladenine (autophagy inhibitor). One week after the nerve damage, fibrosis was potently inhibited in rapamycin-treated rats and, based on gait analysis, yielded a better functional outcome. Immunohistochemistry showed that the autophagic activity of SCs and the accumulation of neurofilaments were upregulated in rapamycin-treated rats. A deficiency of SC autophagic activity might be an early event in nerve scar formation, and modulating autophagy might be a powerful pharmacological approach for improving functional outcomes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 14%
Student > Master 3 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Student > Postgraduate 2 7%
Other 5 17%
Unknown 8 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 5 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 7%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 10 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2018.
All research outputs
#20,663,600
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Molecular Neuroscience
#1,156
of 1,643 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#267,928
of 343,278 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Molecular Neuroscience
#17
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,643 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,278 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.