↓ Skip to main content

Aggregated Aβ1-42 Is Selectively Toxic for Neurons, Whereas Glial Cells Produce Mature Fibrils with Low Toxicity in Drosophila

Overview of attention for article published in Cell Chemical Biology, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
10 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Aggregated Aβ1-42 Is Selectively Toxic for Neurons, Whereas Glial Cells Produce Mature Fibrils with Low Toxicity in Drosophila
Published in
Cell Chemical Biology, April 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.chembiol.2018.03.006
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maria Jonson, Sofie Nyström, Alexander Sandberg, Marcus Carlback, Wojciech Michno, Jörg Hanrieder, Annika Starkenberg, K. Peter R. Nilsson, Stefan Thor, Per Hammarström

Abstract

The basis for selective vulnerability of certain cell types for misfolded proteins (MPs) in neurodegenerative diseases is largely unknown. This knowledge is crucial for understanding disease progression in relation to MPs spreading in the CNS. We assessed this issue in Drosophila by cell-specific expression of human Aβ1-42 associated with Alzheimer's disease. Expression of Aβ1-42 in various neurons resulted in concentration-dependent severe neurodegenerative phenotypes, and intraneuronal ring-tangle-like aggregates with immature fibril properties when analyzed by aggregate-specific ligands. Unexpectedly, expression of Aβ1-42 from a pan-glial driver produced a mild phenotype despite massive brain load of Aβ1-42 aggregates, even higher than in the strongest neuronal driver. Glial cells formed more mature fibrous aggregates, morphologically distinct from aggregates found in neurons, and was mainly extracellular. Our findings implicate that Aβ1-42 cytotoxicity is both cell and aggregate morphotype dependent.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 75 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 16%
Student > Bachelor 12 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 15%
Other 5 7%
Student > Master 4 5%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 24 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 27%
Neuroscience 8 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 5%
Chemistry 3 4%
Other 12 16%
Unknown 23 31%