↓ Skip to main content

Revision of the genus Poromitra (Melamphaidae): Part 1. Species of group P. crassiceps

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Ichthyology, August 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#15 of 225)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
Revision of the genus Poromitra (Melamphaidae): Part 1. Species of group P. crassiceps
Published in
Journal of Ichthyology, August 2008
DOI 10.1134/s0032945208070011
Authors

A. N. Kotlyar

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 8%
Unknown 12 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 31%
Professor 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Student > Master 1 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 46%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 8%
Unknown 6 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2020.
All research outputs
#4,697,128
of 22,792,160 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ichthyology
#15
of 225 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,482
of 85,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ichthyology
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,792,160 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 85,211 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them