↓ Skip to main content

Empathy and Social Perspective Taking in Children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder

Overview of attention for article published in Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology, August 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
117 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
250 Mendeley
Title
Empathy and Social Perspective Taking in Children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
Published in
Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology, August 2008
DOI 10.1007/s10802-008-9262-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Imola Marton, Judith Wiener, Maria Rogers, Chris Moore, Rosemary Tannock

Abstract

This study explored empathy and social perspective taking in 8 to 12 year old children with and without Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). The sample comprised 92 children, 50 with a diagnosis of ADHD and 42 typically developing comparison children. Although children with ADHD were rated by their parents as less empathic than children without ADHD, this difference was accounted for by co-occurring oppositional and conduct problems among children in the ADHD sample. Children with ADHD used lower levels of social perspective taking coordination in their definition of problems, identification of feelings, and evaluation of outcomes than children without ADHD, and these differences persisted after the role of language abilities, intelligence and oppositional and conduct problems were taken into account. Girls were more empathic and had higher overall social perspective taking scores than boys. Implications for research and practice are discussed.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 250 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 243 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 47 19%
Student > Master 37 15%
Student > Bachelor 26 10%
Researcher 24 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 7%
Other 48 19%
Unknown 50 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 116 46%
Social Sciences 22 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 5%
Neuroscience 8 3%
Arts and Humanities 7 3%
Other 21 8%
Unknown 64 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2020.
All research outputs
#4,835,157
of 25,368,786 outputs
Outputs from Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology
#493
of 2,047 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,932
of 94,520 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology
#1
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,368,786 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,047 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,520 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.