↓ Skip to main content

Der Larynxtubus

Overview of attention for article published in Die Anaesthesiologie, August 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
Title
Der Larynxtubus
Published in
Die Anaesthesiologie, August 2004
DOI 10.1007/s00101-004-0697-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

M. Wrobel, U. Grundmann, W. Wilhelm, S. Wagner, R. Larsen

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the classical laryngeal mask airway (LMA) with the laryngeal tube (LT) in anaesthetised non-paralysed patients.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1 10%
Lecturer 1 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 10%
Unknown 7 70%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 30%
Unknown 7 70%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 August 2016.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Die Anaesthesiologie
#126
of 622 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,553
of 61,346 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Die Anaesthesiologie
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 622 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 61,346 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.