↓ Skip to main content

A paperfluidic platform to detect Neisseria gonorrhoeae in clinical samples

Overview of attention for article published in Biomedical Microdevices, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
87 Mendeley
Title
A paperfluidic platform to detect Neisseria gonorrhoeae in clinical samples
Published in
Biomedical Microdevices, April 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10544-018-0280-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Audrey L. Horst, Justin M. Rosenbohm, Nikunja Kolluri, Justin Hardick, Charlotte A. Gaydos, Mario Cabodi, Catherine M. Klapperich, Jacqueline C. Linnes

Abstract

Globally, the microbe Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG) causes 106 million newly documented sexually transmitted infections each year. Once appropriately diagnosed, NG infections can be readily treated with antibiotics, but high-risk patients often do not return to the clinic for treatment if results are not provided at the point of care. A rapid, sensitive molecular diagnostic would help increase NG treatment and reduce the prevalence of this sexually transmitted disease. Here, we report on the design and development of a rapid, highly sensitive, paperfluidic device for point-of-care diagnosis of NG. The device integrates patient swab sample lysis, nucleic acid extraction, thermophilic helicase-dependent amplification (tHDA), an internal amplification control (NGIC), and visual lateral flow detection within an 80 min run time. Limits of NG detection for the NG/NGIC multiplex tHDA assay were determined within the device, and clinical performance was validated retroactively against qPCR-quantified patient samples in a proof-of-concept study. This paperfluidic diagnostic has a clinically relevant limit of detection of 500 NG cells per device with analytical sensitivity down to 10 NG cells per device. In triplicate testing of 40 total urethral and vaginal swab samples, the device had 95% overall sensitivity and 100% specificity, approaching current laboratory-based molecular NG diagnostics. This diagnostic platform could increase access to accurate NG diagnoses to those most in need.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 87 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 23%
Student > Master 9 10%
Researcher 9 10%
Student > Bachelor 5 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 13 15%
Unknown 26 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 21 24%
Chemical Engineering 8 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 9%
Chemistry 4 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 5%
Other 9 10%
Unknown 33 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2021.
All research outputs
#3,606,353
of 23,043,346 outputs
Outputs from Biomedical Microdevices
#76
of 755 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,738
of 329,173 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biomedical Microdevices
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,043,346 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 755 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,173 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.