↓ Skip to main content

Spondylolisthesis and tumors: a treatment algorithm

Overview of attention for article published in European Spine Journal, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
Title
Spondylolisthesis and tumors: a treatment algorithm
Published in
European Spine Journal, April 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00586-018-5589-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Riccardo Cecchinato, Stefano Boriani

Abstract

Pars defect and spondylolisthesis are frequent conditions, while bone tumors-particularly the primaries-are rare. The contemporary occurrence can delay the diagnosis of the tumor, if symptoms are considered related to spondylolisthesis, or can make reconstruction more demanding. To our knowledge, only two case reports of this contemporary occurrence have been published in the literature. Being such rare, guidelines on surgical treatment have not been proposed yet. A retrospective review of patients treated for spine bone tumors by the senior author from 1990 to 2017 was performed to find cases of contemporary occurrence of spondylolisthesis and/or pars defect and spine bone tumors. General health data, radiological imaging, histological tumor diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up were analyzed and discussed. Among the 1870 patients treated for spinal tumors between 1990 and 2017 by the senior author, 14 cases of association between tumors and spondylolysis/spondylolisthesis were observed. The cohort includes five males (35.7%) and nine females (64.3%), aged 14-72. Mean age of patients at surgery time was 47. Interactions between spondylolisthesis and bone tumors of the spine are episodic. These two conditions rarely occur in the same patient. No treatment strategy has been described until now. The target of this paper is to propose an algorithm to surgically treat patients with concomitant bone tumor and spondylolisthesis. This classification identifies a treatment-oriented algorithm based on two major categories: type A, bone tumor arising on the same vertebra or to an adjacent level; type B, bone tumor arising at least one unit far from the spondylolisthesis. This algorithm can help the surgeon facing this rare combination of diseases in the appropriate preoperative planning. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 3 11%
Unspecified 2 7%
Researcher 2 7%
Professor 2 7%
Student > Postgraduate 2 7%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 15 54%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 36%
Unspecified 1 4%
Neuroscience 1 4%
Engineering 1 4%
Unknown 15 54%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2018.
All research outputs
#15,505,836
of 23,043,346 outputs
Outputs from European Spine Journal
#2,056
of 4,674 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#209,019
of 327,997 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Spine Journal
#20
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,043,346 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,674 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,997 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.