↓ Skip to main content

Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in interventional oncology

Overview of attention for article published in Abdominal Radiology, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
Title
Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in interventional oncology
Published in
Abdominal Radiology, April 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00261-018-1581-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sriharsha Gummadi, John R. Eisenbrey, Andrej Lyshchik

Abstract

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) has evolved from the use of agitated saline to second generation bioengineered microbubbles designed to withstand insonation with limited destruction. While only one of these newer agents is approved by the Food and Drug Administration for use outside echocardiography, interventional radiologists are increasingly finding off-label uses for ultrasound contrast agents. Notably, these agents have an extremely benign safety profile with no hepatic or renal toxicities and no radiation exposure. Alongside diagnostic applications, CEUS has begun to develop its own niche within the realm of interventional oncology. Certainly, the characterization of focal solid organ lesions (such as hepatic and renal lesions) by CEUS has been an important development. However, interventional oncologists are finding that the dynamic and real-time information afforded by CEUS can improve biopsy guidance, ablation therapy, and provide early evidence of tumor viability after locoregional therapy. Even more novel uses of CEUS include lymph node mapping and sentinel lymph node localization. Critical areas of research still exist. The purpose of this article is to provide a narrative review of the emerging roles of CEUS in interventional oncology.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 13%
Student > Postgraduate 3 13%
Other 2 9%
Researcher 2 9%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 8 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 39%
Computer Science 1 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Unknown 12 52%