| Title |
High Expression of Aurora-B/Aurora and Ipl1-Like Midbody-Associated Protein (AIM-1) in Astrocytomas
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Neuro-Oncology, March 2004
|
| DOI | 10.1023/b:neon.0000021784.33421.05 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kasumi Araki, Kazuhiko Nozaki, Tetsuya Ueba, Masaaki Tatsuka, Nobuo Hashimoto |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 29 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 14% |
| Researcher | 4 | 14% |
| Professor | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 10% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 6 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 34% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 14% |
| Psychology | 1 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 8 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2012.
All research outputs
#3,798,611
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuro-Oncology
#322
of 3,255 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,502
of 63,045 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuro-Oncology
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,255 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 63,045 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them