| Title |
Die Berechnung der Turnier-Ergebnisse als ein Maximumproblem der Wahrscheinlichkeitsrechnung
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Mathematische Zeitschrift, December 1929
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf01180541 |
| Authors |
E. Zermelo |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 8% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| Denmark | 1 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 30 | 83% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 28% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 14% |
| Researcher | 5 | 14% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 11% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 4 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 13 | 36% |
| Mathematics | 9 | 25% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 6% |
| Engineering | 2 | 6% |
| Psychology | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 5 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2023.
All research outputs
#7,720,531
of 23,476,369 outputs
Outputs from Mathematische Zeitschrift
#39
of 583 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124
of 3,433 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mathematische Zeitschrift
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,476,369 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 583 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 3,433 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them