↓ Skip to main content

5S and 5.8S ribosomal RNA evolution in the suborder tetrahymenina (Ciliophora: Hymenostomatida)

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Molecular Evolution, November 1985
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
5S and 5.8S ribosomal RNA evolution in the suborder tetrahymenina (Ciliophora: Hymenostomatida)
Published in
Journal of Molecular Evolution, November 1985
DOI 10.1007/bf02099752
Pubmed ID
Authors

Craig T. Van Bell

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 20%
United States 1 20%
Unknown 3 60%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 40%
Student > Bachelor 2 40%
Other 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 80%
Unknown 1 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2014.
All research outputs
#7,455,523
of 22,792,160 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Molecular Evolution
#450
of 1,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,961
of 10,866 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Molecular Evolution
#4
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,792,160 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,438 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 10,866 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.