| Title |
The identity of Menacanthus eisenachensis Balát (Insecta, Phthiraptera, Amblycera, Menoponidae) from the Reed Warbler (Passeriformes, Sylviidae)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Acta Parasitologica, October 2008
|
| DOI | 10.2478/s11686-008-0060-5 |
| Authors |
Oldřich Sychra, Jens-Kjeld Jensen, Michael Brooke, Alfréd Trnka, Petr Procházka, Ivan Literák |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 7% |
| Czechia | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 13 | 87% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 40% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 13% |
| Librarian | 1 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 2 | 13% |
| Unknown | 2 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 60% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 13% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 2 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2010.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Acta Parasitologica
#87
of 735 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,218
of 104,326 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Parasitologica
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 735 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,326 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them