↓ Skip to main content

Progress and problems in the assessment of flower morphology in higher-level systematics

Overview of attention for article published in Plant Systematics and Evolution, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
Title
Progress and problems in the assessment of flower morphology in higher-level systematics
Published in
Plant Systematics and Evolution, January 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00606-011-0576-2
Authors

Peter K. Endress, Merran L. Matthews

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 4 6%
United States 1 1%
France 1 1%
China 1 1%
Unknown 64 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 20%
Professor > Associate Professor 10 14%
Researcher 9 13%
Student > Master 8 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Other 13 18%
Unknown 13 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 51 72%
Environmental Science 2 3%
Arts and Humanities 1 1%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 1%
Engineering 1 1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 15 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 December 2022.
All research outputs
#7,862,539
of 23,839,820 outputs
Outputs from Plant Systematics and Evolution
#146
of 945 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,177
of 246,769 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Systematics and Evolution
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,839,820 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 945 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 246,769 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them