↓ Skip to main content

Vascular defects in a mouse model of hypotrichosis-lymphedema-telangiectasia syndrome indicate a role for SOX18 in blood vessel maturation

Overview of attention for article published in Human Molecular Genetics, May 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Vascular defects in a mouse model of hypotrichosis-lymphedema-telangiectasia syndrome indicate a role for SOX18 in blood vessel maturation
Published in
Human Molecular Genetics, May 2009
DOI 10.1093/hmg/ddp219
Pubmed ID
Authors

Meredith Downes, Mathias François, Charles Ferguson, Robert G. Parton, Peter Koopman

Abstract

Mutations in the transcription factor gene SOX18 cause vascular, lymphatic and hair follicle defects in humans with dominant and recessive forms of hypotrichosis-lymphedema-telangiectasia (HLT) syndrome. Here, we clarify the role of SOX18 in the vascular dysfunction in HLT by ultrastructural, immunofluorescence, molecular and functional analysis of vascular anomalies in embryos of the naturally occurring Sox18-mutant mouse strain ragged-opossum (Ra(Op)). Early genesis and patterning of vasculature was unimpaired in Ra(Op) embryos, but surface capillaries became enlarged from 12.5 dpc and embryos developed massive surface hemorrhage by 14.5 dpc. Large focal breaches in the endothelial barrier were observed, in addition to endothelial hyperplasia associated with impaired pericyte recruitment to the microvasculature. Expression of the genes encoding the endothelial factors MMP7, IL7R and N-cadherin was reduced in Ra(Op) embryos, suggesting that these are downstream targets of SOX18. Together, our results indicate that vascular anomalies in HLT arise from defects in regulation of genes required for the acquisition of structural integrity during microvascular maturation.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Austria 1 3%
Unknown 33 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 21%
Researcher 6 18%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 12%
Student > Postgraduate 3 9%
Student > Master 3 9%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 6 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 38%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Mathematics 1 3%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2021.
All research outputs
#8,533,995
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Human Molecular Genetics
#4,003
of 8,251 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,953
of 103,620 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Molecular Genetics
#28
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,251 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,620 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.