↓ Skip to main content

Integration of cultural and mechanical practices for management of the mango mealybug Drosicha mangiferae

Overview of attention for article published in Phytoparasitica, April 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#43 of 225)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
Title
Integration of cultural and mechanical practices for management of the mango mealybug Drosicha mangiferae
Published in
Phytoparasitica, April 2010
DOI 10.1007/s12600-010-0094-8
Authors

Haider Karar, Ali H. Sayyed, M. Jalal Arif, M. Ashfaq, M. Aslam

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 16%
Researcher 4 16%
Student > Master 2 8%
Professor 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 9 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 52%
Unspecified 1 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Environmental Science 1 4%
Unknown 9 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 June 2014.
All research outputs
#7,455,523
of 22,792,160 outputs
Outputs from Phytoparasitica
#43
of 225 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,552
of 94,887 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Phytoparasitica
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,792,160 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,887 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.