↓ Skip to main content

Gerbode defect: Another nail for the 3D transesophagel echo hammer?

Overview of attention for article published in The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
Title
Gerbode defect: Another nail for the 3D transesophagel echo hammer?
Published in
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging, February 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10554-015-0620-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tuncay Taskesen, Andrew Fred Prouse, Steven Lewis Goldberg, Edward Allen Gill

Abstract

Acquired type of LV to RA shunt (Gerbode defect) is rare form of intracardiac shunt which is due to complications of invasive cardiac procedures, endocarditis, trauma or myocardial infarction. Increasing invasive and recurrent cardiovascular procedures have led to more acquired cases of what used to be a predominant congenital heart defect. Advanced cardiac imaging techniques and awareness of this rare pathology may account for the increased number of case reports in the last two decades Advanced cardiac imaging tools such as cardiac CT, MRI and Real-time 3D echocardiography provide definitive diagnosis and anatomic characterization of the shunt. Real-time 3D echocardiography is an imaging technique with arguably the most advantages. It is not only a diagnostic tool; it has also become an integral part of percutaneous and surgical treatment. Although surgical repair is the usual treatment for this shunt, percutaneous catheter-based closure has seen significant success as a less invasive treatment in selected patients in the last decade. In summary, a beneficial side effect of the increasing frequency of acquired Gerbode defect has been the corresponding development of newer diagnostic tools and less invasive treatments. This article presents etiologic, diagnostic and treatment changes of acquired LV-RA shunts over the last two decades.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 7 21%
Student > Master 5 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Researcher 3 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 6%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 9 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 48%
Psychology 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Neuroscience 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 13 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2015.
All research outputs
#22,759,802
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging
#1,460
of 2,012 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#316,788
of 369,481 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging
#28
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,012 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,481 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.