↓ Skip to main content

Quadtree-adaptive tsunami modelling

Overview of attention for article published in Ocean Dynamics, May 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
98 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Quadtree-adaptive tsunami modelling
Published in
Ocean Dynamics, May 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10236-011-0438-z
Authors

Stéphane Popinet

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
China 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 85 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 28%
Researcher 23 26%
Student > Master 9 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Professor 3 3%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 16 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 24 27%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 14 16%
Environmental Science 7 8%
Mathematics 7 8%
Physics and Astronomy 7 8%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 25 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2014.
All research outputs
#7,455,523
of 22,792,160 outputs
Outputs from Ocean Dynamics
#142
of 962 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,665
of 111,195 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ocean Dynamics
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,792,160 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 962 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 111,195 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.