↓ Skip to main content

Genetic Variation in Genes Underlying Diverse Dementias May Explain a Small Proportion of Cases in the Alzheimer’s Disease Sequencing Project

Overview of attention for article published in Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Genetic Variation in Genes Underlying Diverse Dementias May Explain a Small Proportion of Cases in the Alzheimer’s Disease Sequencing Project
Published in
Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders, February 2018
DOI 10.1159/000485503
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elizabeth E. Blue, Joshua C. Bis, Michael O. Dorschner, Debby W. Tsuang, Sandra M. Barral, Gary Beecham, Jennifer E. Below, William S. Bush, Mariusz Butkiewicz, Carlos Cruchaga, Anita DeStefano, Lindsay A. Farrer, Alison Goate, Jonathan Haines, Jim Jaworski, Gyungah Jun, Brian Kunkle, Amanda Kuzma, Jenny J. Lee, Kathryn L. Lunetta, Yiyi Ma, Eden Martin, Adam Naj, Alejandro Q. Nato, Patrick Navas, Hiep Nguyen, Christiane Reitz, Dolly Reyes, William Salerno, Gerard D. Schellenberg, Sudha Seshadri, Harkirat Sohi, Timothy A. Thornton, Otto Valadares, Cornelia van Duijn, Badri N. Vardarajan, Li-San Wang, Eric Boerwinkle, Josée Dupuis, Margaret A. Pericak-Vance, Richard Mayeux, Ellen M. Wijsman

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 72 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 17%
Student > Master 6 8%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Professor 4 6%
Other 15 21%
Unknown 17 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 21%
Neuroscience 11 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Other 12 17%
Unknown 21 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2018.
All research outputs
#3,432,886
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders
#140
of 1,084 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,885
of 347,262 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders
#2
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,084 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,262 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.