↓ Skip to main content

Representation, similarity, and the chorus of prototypes

Overview of attention for article published in Minds and Machines, February 1995
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
5 patents
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
129 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
Title
Representation, similarity, and the chorus of prototypes
Published in
Minds and Machines, February 1995
DOI 10.1007/bf00974189
Authors

Shimon Edelman

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 4%
Germany 2 4%
Finland 1 2%
South Africa 1 2%
Unknown 50 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 30%
Researcher 9 16%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 14%
Professor 4 7%
Student > Bachelor 3 5%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 6 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 20 36%
Computer Science 9 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 9%
Philosophy 5 9%
Neuroscience 3 5%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 5 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2016.
All research outputs
#5,032,776
of 23,906,448 outputs
Outputs from Minds and Machines
#85
of 323 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,612
of 78,774 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Minds and Machines
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,906,448 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 323 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 78,774 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them