↓ Skip to main content

Maximising, Satisficing and Context*

Overview of attention for article published in Nous, August 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Maximising, Satisficing and Context*
Published in
Nous, August 2010
DOI 10.1111/j.1468-0068.2010.00750.x
Authors

C.S. Jenkins, Daniel Nolan

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 23%
Student > Postgraduate 2 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 15%
Professor 2 15%
Lecturer 1 8%
Other 3 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Philosophy 4 31%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 15%
Social Sciences 2 15%
Psychology 2 15%
Computer Science 1 8%
Other 2 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2013.
All research outputs
#8,636,620
of 25,628,260 outputs
Outputs from Nous
#112
of 418 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,459
of 104,889 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nous
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,628,260 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 418 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,889 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.